The Killer Covid-19 Virus – A Brief Essay to the Most Selfish Generations?

Millennials and Generation Z.  Are they our most selfish generations?  They want free healthcare.  They want free college.  They want their student debts forgiven.  These generations want guaranteed income.  They want to take liberty from some and redistribute its benefits to themselves.  They believe themselves to be immune.  They see themselves as “special.”  To be their own community, separate, distinct and apart from everyone else.  They see their fellow human beings as here to serve and provide for them.  They are owed things to which they are entitled.

What will or do they offer in return?   When called upon to sacrifice, like almost every generation before them, they refuse.

It’s too much ask, they say.   How dare you ask us to stay home?  It’s inconvenient.  It’s unfair for us to give up spring-break.  We can’t live without partying.  We’ve got to hit the bars, the gyms, the games.  Sacrifice?  No way!  This virus isn’t going to kill us.  We are immune (actually, no).  Four, eight or even ten weeks is simply too much to ask of these most selfish generations.  Weeks of sacrifice are bridges too far.The most selfish generations

We used to ask of Americans: “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”  Question to them: who said this?  (Hint: the 35th President of the United States).  But these most selfish generations don’t care.  Sacrifice, community compassion – these are words that just don’t apply to them.  They’re not being asked to storm the beaches, for goodness sake.  Just stay in that awful apartment of yours and – heaven forbid – read some books, preferably about American history starting pre-Revolutionary War.  Or maybe a little ethics, morality, liberalism – whatever.

The most selfish generations, you have a choice.  In a time like now take responsibility for whatever you do – or fail to do.  It’s time to grow.  You cannot escape the reality that your refusal to follow social distancing will lead to death.  Perhaps not your own (but recent data suggest yes, maybe your own), but most certainly yes – it will lead to death.  When you know that your actions put others at grave risk, then you have a moral responsibility to them.  You cannot escape this moral responsibility by refusing to accept it.  It’s here and it’s now.  And there is no liberal theory which can assuage and unburden you.

It’s time to realize that you are not so personally significant as to be spared.  Not from the killing virus.  And not from the responsibility you bear from passing it along to those who cannot survive it.  Your actions can either spare those around you – or kill them.  Your handling of the task left to you now – to sacrifice a brief moment in your lives for the benefit of others – may bring honor to each of you.  Or it will burn into your soul, from now until your final days whenever they may be, the stain of dishonor that your children, will they come to pass, will carry with shame.  Rise to the occasion and experience what it is to be countrymen.  The duty falls to you.

Football Analytics – Way Over-Hyped

Sports decision-making.  Once dominated by coaching judgments, but now increasingly the captive of mathematicians.  Teams of self-styled math gurus scrub data of every conceivable sort searching for heretofore obscured “insights”.  Subjective decision-making replaced by rules-based decision making. The goal of analytics?  Extract insights from prior events to guide future decisions and increase the probability of desired future outcomes.  A tool that, where “insights” are generated, is assumed will enhance outcome-probabilities.  Mathematical analysis will improve outcomes.  But is this assumption in sports, particularly football, correct?  How useful are football analytics? Continue reading “Football Analytics – Way Over-Hyped”

Collusion Between Trump and the Russians? No Crime Unless It Involved Hacking

So what if there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government?  Is that a crime, as everyone seems to assume? According to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, “collusion” between the Russian government and President Trump and/or his campaign is not a crime, unless the collusion involved the act of hacking itself.  Pretty startling, right?  And based on the public record as it now stands, there is no evidence of collusion between the campaign and the Russians involving the act of hacking.  No aiding or abetting by the Trump campaign in the hack attacks.  Without other evidence, there’s simply no crime here.  Let’s look a little further at Professor Dershowitz’s analysis. Continue reading “Collusion Between Trump and the Russians? No Crime Unless It Involved Hacking”

The Donald Trump Criminal Theory? Donald Trump the Fool

Is Trump the fool?  There really are only two possibilities regarding President Trump.  Maybe he’s a liar and a criminal.  Did he collude with the Russian government in the 2016 election?  If he did, that could never be fully hidden, and crime after crime would inevitably ensue.  The whole thing would inevitably blow up.  Would that explain his possibly “asking” former FBI Director Comey to “just let Mike Flynn go?”  Perhaps.  Could that explain his subsequent firing of Comey because the FBI was relentlessly pursuing the collusion thesis?  Or maybe the FBI was just getting too close to the hard proof of collusion (though we doubt Trump would know it)?  Again, perhaps.

But we have an alternative theory.  It’s a simple theory.  Perhaps President Trump is just a fool.  Not even a knave – it’s just Trump the fool.   Continue reading “The Donald Trump Criminal Theory? Donald Trump the Fool”

Special Prosecutor is Not Needed – Let the FBI Conduct the Investigation

We don’t know with certainty whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 election.  And if that collusion existed, we don’t know whether President Trump was directly or indirectly involved.  Perhaps at this point, only he knows (though we doubt it).  But a special prosecutor is not needed yet.  And Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, once again, places the interests of his political faction above those of the country.    Continue reading “Special Prosecutor is Not Needed – Let the FBI Conduct the Investigation”

President Obama’s Failure to Fire FBI Director Comey – It Was All Politics

President Trump’s decision to fire FBI Director Comey has rightly led to questions about his motivations and judgment.  We discuss that elsewhere.  But President Obama’s failure to fire Director Comey is troubling, albeit for different reasons.  Why didn’t President Obama fire Comey immediately after Comey’s initial conclusion of the Hillary investigation?  Obama’s judgment was also poor.  But we believe his primary motivation was something altogether different.  It was just politics, pure and simple.  And it’s yet another example of a President placing politics above the needs of the country. Continue reading “President Obama’s Failure to Fire FBI Director Comey – It Was All Politics”

Wisconsin’s Voter-ID Law Suppressed Votes? – A Misleading Account

The Nation published a story yesterday by Ari Berman with the headline “Wisconsin’s Voter-ID Law Suppressed 200,000 Votes in 2016 (Trump Won by 22,478).”  Here’s a definitive statement that 200,000 votes were in fact suppressed by Wisconsin’s Voter-ID law.  And a blunt inference that, but for this suppression, Trump would not have won in Wisconsin.  The problem with Mr. Berman’s headline is simple.  It is not supported by the facts.  It is yet another example of a media outlet misleading its readers.  And an example of a failure of a published reporter to demand of himself accuracy in his reporting.  Shame, shame, shame. Continue reading “Wisconsin’s Voter-ID Law Suppressed Votes? – A Misleading Account”

Comey Deserved to Be Fired, But Trump’s Judgment Was Terrible

The firing of FBI Director James Comey was long overdue.  Comey deserved to be fired.  But President Trump was wrong to do it now.  Rants to the contrary notwithstanding, this is not the Saturday Night Massacre.  Not by a long shot.  But President Trump’s decision is yet the latest example of poor judgment – very poor judgment.  Poor presidential judgment jeopardizes a President’s ability to effectively lead.  The nation becomes weaker in the eyes of friends and foe alike.  The subsequent need to show decisiveness and leadership grows, as is the risk of making follow-on poor judgments.  This is the underlying risk of President Trump’s decision, and it cannot be understated. Continue reading “Comey Deserved to Be Fired, But Trump’s Judgment Was Terrible”

Americans’ Moral Obligation to Pay Taxes – But It’s Limited

Are Americans proud to pay their taxes?  Vanessa Williamson of the Brookings Institute thinks so, after studying survey data and conducting interviews.  She finds that Americans view paying taxes as a civic and moral responsibility, and the price of citizenship.  She believes that “the idea that ‘Americans hate taxes’ has become a truism without the benefit of being true.”  But this rather surface conclusion misses the point.  There is a real distinction between a moral obligation to pay taxes and a legal obligation. Continue reading “Americans’ Moral Obligation to Pay Taxes – But It’s Limited”

Deaf Ears to Maryland Black Caucus on Marijuana – And Rightly So

Michele Obama once said “when they go low we go high.”  But not the Maryland Black Caucus (MBC).  For them, “when they go low we get high  [just kidding] – it is racism!”  In a pathetic example of playing the race card, the Maryland Black Caucus screamed foul when there were no awards of Maryland’s 15 marijuana grower licenses to African-Americans. But it all falls on deaf ears in a Maryland legislature lambasted by the MBC with overtures of claimed corruption.  And outward – and ill-founded – claims of racism.   Continue reading “Deaf Ears to Maryland Black Caucus on Marijuana – And Rightly So”